Comments on: TSSJS roundup http://blog.caucho.com/2009/03/20/tssjs-roundup/ Inside info, thoughts, and opinions from Caucho engineers Tue, 21 May 2013 15:03:53 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1 hourly 1 By: ferg http://blog.caucho.com/2009/03/20/tssjs-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-46 ferg Fri, 20 Mar 2009 17:40:14 +0000 http://blog.caucho.com/?p=171#comment-46 <em>"What I found interesting is that while this topic seemed to be very contentious within the JEE 6 EG, the attendees of this session just wanted Java CanDI in. Its utility was apparent to them and they didn't care about the political debate, they just want it in."</em> Yep. That's pretty much the issue with Java CanDI (JSR-299). Java developers are very excited about CanDI and love the new capabilities, but the EJB expert group still believes EJB is the One True Java Component Model and wants CanDI stopped or crippled. “What I found interesting is that while this topic seemed to be very contentious within the JEE 6 EG, the attendees of this session just wanted Java CanDI in. Its utility was apparent to them and they didn’t care about the political debate, they just want it in.”

Yep. That’s pretty much the issue with Java CanDI (JSR-299). Java developers are very excited about CanDI and love the new capabilities, but the EJB expert group still believes EJB is the One True Java Component Model and wants CanDI stopped or crippled.

]]>