Comments on: selecting implementations with WebBeans http://blog.caucho.com/2008/11/17/selecting-implementations-with-webbeans/ Inside info, thoughts, and opinions from Caucho engineers Sun, 26 May 2013 09:26:41 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1 hourly 1 By: ferg http://blog.caucho.com/2008/11/17/selecting-implementations-with-webbeans/comment-page-1/#comment-19 ferg Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:37:05 +0000 http://blog.caucho.com/?p=110#comment-19 Nothing wrong with being an ego maniac :). And thanks for writing the tutorial, it made these notes much easier to write. I haven't looked at crank yet, but scanning it looks very interesting. I've been putting off the direct comparison with Spring because it's becoming increasingly difficult to pick a fair flavor to talk about. If I talk about the old-style <bean>, or <property>, then I'm skipping the annotations or p:foo variation or the custom syntax. And yet the old-style <bean> is still the most common. For exaimple, if you look at the Spring/OSGi proposal in OSGi 4.2, they still use old-style Spring syntax, so it's certainly not deprecated. I might cheat and write two separate comparisons. Nothing wrong with being an ego maniac :). And thanks for writing the tutorial, it made these notes much easier to write.

I haven’t looked at crank yet, but scanning it looks very interesting.

I’ve been putting off the direct comparison with Spring because it’s becoming increasingly difficult to pick a fair flavor to talk about. If I talk about the old-style <bean>, or <property>, then I’m skipping the annotations or p:foo variation or the custom syntax. And yet the old-style <bean> is still the most common. For exaimple, if you look at the Spring/OSGi proposal in OSGi 4.2, they still use old-style Spring syntax, so it’s certainly not deprecated. I might cheat and write two separate comparisons.

]]> By: RickHigh http://blog.caucho.com/2008/11/17/selecting-implementations-with-webbeans/comment-page-1/#comment-16 RickHigh Sat, 22 Nov 2008 21:14:41 +0000 http://blog.caucho.com/?p=110#comment-16 WRT: It makes it easier to follow this one. What I meant was it makes it easier for me to follow..... Without the "for me", I just sound like an ego maniac... WRT: It makes it easier to follow this one.

What I meant was it makes it easier for me to follow….. Without the “for me”, I just sound like an ego maniac…

]]> By: RickHigh http://blog.caucho.com/2008/11/17/selecting-implementations-with-webbeans/comment-page-1/#comment-15 RickHigh Sat, 22 Nov 2008 21:13:24 +0000 http://blog.caucho.com/?p=110#comment-15 Great example using WebBeans... With Spring you can also use user-defined annotations.... Thanks for writing this. And thanks for using my example as a guide. It makes it easier to follow this one. Have you checked out the Crank framework? http://code.google.com/p/krank/ It is what I do when I am not consulting, training or writing... Let me know what you think. Great example using WebBeans… With Spring you can also use user-defined annotations…. Thanks for writing this. And thanks for using my example as a guide. It makes it easier to follow this one.

Have you checked out the Crank framework? http://code.google.com/p/krank/

It is what I do when I am not consulting, training or writing… Let me know what you think.

]]>